5 Real Differences Between Scottish and Crimean Referendums

The official UK Ukrainian Twitter feed, which reads as if it’s written by a 13-year-old pro-Ukraine radical, has recently been trumpeting this –

Fullscreen capture 19032015 153213.bmp

All very convenient for a retweet. Sadly, complete gubbins – none of them were anywhere near Crimea at the time of the referendum. I was, and here’s the 5 real differences –

1. The Scottish referendum wasn’t held after a violent revolution (Euromaidan – pictured below) had installed a far-right government which had, as its defining aims the destruction of its history culture (from historical monuments to removal of Black Sea Fleet).

1eur3

2. Euromaidan deposed an elected president, and government, voted for democratically by the people of Crimea, who emphatically did not support Euromaidan. Why should they have been forced to accept a terrorist coup? (More Euromaidan pictured)

1euromaidan

3. Access to Crimea was free to anyone who wanted to observe the referendum. I entered in a car with no licence plates without any letter of journalistic accreditation.

1Rov1

4. Any oppression or intimidation came on the side of those who wanted to support Russia, but were not allowed to do so. Several Crimean Tatars expressed to me they had been warned their homes would be burned down if they voted for Russia. Some Tatars even tried to remove ballot boxes, there was no security to stop them, locals stopped them. However, some Tatars openly supported Russia.

5. There were no soldiers or guns at any of the polling stations. People voted freely, the result reflected the wishes of the vast, vast majority of Crimeans.

2 thoughts on “5 Real Differences Between Scottish and Crimean Referendums”

  1. I think the most important difference is this: the UK government recognized the right of Scotland to choose their own destiny. The coup government of Kiev immediately threatened Crimea and declared the referendum illegal.
    And the results were pretty logical. If the central government behaves well, regions have little incentive to leave. If it starts repressing the popular will, people choose to go their own way.

    Like

  2. Those who say that “it was a forced vote” how about the mass celebrations that took place in Crimea after the results were announced and also this week marking an anniversary? I don’t think you can force thousands of people to celebrate in all cities of Crimea! If the peoples are happy then what are they on about?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s